![]() |
Area-Under-The-Curve Analysis |
DAY #3: I'm very impressed with how we were able to solve our area-under-the-curve dilema, NICELY DONE EVERYONE! Just at the close of business yesterday we realized that doing a 1-2-3 "GO" start with two different devices inserted human error (possibly quite a bit of that) into our investigation. Today we're going to see if using two sensors plugged into the SAME laptop will get rid of that error (Oh and I did a wee bit of checking and YES, Vernier says that we can plug up 4 wireless sensors at once using Bluetooth. YAY!) Let's dig in! INVESTIGATIVE QUESTION: Can we determine the accuracy of the 'area-under-the-curve' analytical method? BACKGROUND: We've been working on LOTS of different ways to analyze motion graphs-- This lab will focus on the area-under-the-curve method. The goal of this lab is to see if we can determine the accuracy of taking motion data using that method. Please keep in mind as you go through today's initial work that you'll need to compare the area-under-the-curve data with.... <something> in order to determine the accuracy of your calculations. The first step is to gain further experience with the Vernier accelerometers. Work with your team to:
Now please work with your team to return to the other piece of the puzzle: How can we verify our end result?
NOTE: We have lots to learn and practice and setup today so it is *highly* unlikely we'll actually take 'real' data until tomorrow.
|